 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:42:05 -0400 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-disposition: |
inline |
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
it would be nice, yes -
scientific, too, maybe...?
how about if people start building big archaeological databases online; how
would anyone be able to evaluate the quality of the info coming in if they
weren't aware of the different standards/methods being employed...?
--On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:33 AM -0400 "William B. Liebeknecht"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> In New Jersey you must average 17 shovel tests per acre for phase I
> testing. The NJ guidelines are online at the SHPO's web site. Having
> worked in the northeast region for 20 years I can tell you that NJ, DE,
> PA, NY & MD all have different standards which can be quite a challenge
> sometimes. Some want square holes, some want round holes, some want
> metric measurements on prehistoric sites and English on historic sites.
> They are also constantly changing their standards. It would be nice if
> they could get together to form a regional standard.
> William Liebeknecht
|
|
|
