Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:37:00 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Donald Satz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I do agree with Steve that liking the HIP approach mainly due to historical
>accuracy has little to recommend it. Before I heard any period instrument
>performances of baroque music, I was not satisfied. With the advent of
>HIP, the music took on a new life for me and was illuminating. Accuracy
>had nothing to do with my conclusions.
You weren't satisfied, but then you were? If the accuracy had nothing
to do with it, what was it then? Musn't it be a good idea to enter into
the spirit of what the composer had in mind? I am grateful for HIP;
my favorite set of Brandenbergs is still the Collegium Aureum (once on
Nonesuch), and nothing can surpass the Bach violin concerti by Concentus
Musicus Wein/ Harnoncourt...
But having said that, there are obviously going to be great and
not-so-great HIP performances. And the first Vivaldi/Four Seasons I
ever heard was conducted by Guido Cantelli with the NY Phil on a Columbia
LP (as incorrect as you can get) and I'm still looking for that on CD.
It was full of love and beauty.
Donald Clarke
***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery. For more information,
go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|