Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:18:44 +1000
Subject:
Prokofiev's 7th
From:
Richard Pennycuick <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
For years, the only version of Prokofiev's 7th Symphony that I knew was
an old mono one by the Czech Philharmonic conducted by one N P Anosov
(this was in the days when Russian musicians' first names were, apparently,
a state secret, let alone patronymics), probably originally on Supraphon.
The ending was quiet and sombre, almost bitter.  Years later, I bought
Neeme Jarvi's version and was surprised to find that the ending I was
used to was followed by a short, jolly coda which is more in keeping
with the general mood of the last movement, but jarred nevertheless.

The notes say:

   "During rehearsals, however, he [Prokofiev) was prevailed on
   to accept that a more affirmative ending would be preferable.
   This he provided and is recorded here, although he kept the
   quieter ending so marked in the score as an alternative if
   desired."

I heard the end of Seiji Ozawa's version this morning on the radio
and he does not use the coda.  I wondered whether anyone but Jarvi has
used it in recordings.  I also wondered who it was who prevailed on
Prokofiev to add the coda.  The symphony was written after the infamous
1948 nonsense and it's a fair bet that he was leaned on by one of the
formalism-obsessed apparatchiks.  Anyone know who suggested the change?

Richard Pennycuick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV