Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Sun, 18 May 2003 11:29:41 -0400
Subject:
Re: Shostakovich 11th - Rostropovich
From:
Chris Mullins <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I enjoyed Mr. Schwartz's review of Rostropovich's Shostakovich 11. Here
in Los Angeles Salonen and the Phil have started a Shostakovich cycle,
running chronologically, with 3 scheduled each year. Next year we get
7-9.

However, I would like to better understand the comment about "Bartok's
humorless lead" as applies to criticism of the Seventh. I assume this
is a reference to the parody in the Concerto for Orchestra. I happen to
like both that parody AND the actual Seventh Symphony, so I'm comfortable
with contradictions. I can't quite see how Bartok was "humorless,"
however. Especially as the parody ends with one of the great orchestral
raspberries. Maybe it is mean-spirited, but I see a wicked grin on
Bartok's face as he composed this. And the contrast between this parody
and the achingly beautiful melody that otherwise dominates that movement
makes it one of favorite pieces of music.

Am I reading either Bartok or Mr. Scwartz wrong?

C Mullins
Redondo Beach

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV