Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:48:11 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<008401c472d3$61765f30$7604c518@gollum> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
James Fischer wrote:
> The oft-told fable of honey prices supporting pollination is laughable when
> compared to the actions of US beekeepers when honey prices are high. The
> rational choice of some beekeepers was to keep their colonies out of
> pollination, since pollination both does not produce honey, and tends to
> stress the colonies so that they produce less honey than they would if they
> were not used for pollination.
>
> What is needed to support pollination is a decent pollination fee per hive.
> Muddying the waters with talk of honey prices only serves to insure that
> pollination fees will remain low, and beekeepers will continue to try to
> both pollinate and produce a honey crop, doing neither as well as either
> could be done alone, and suffering the higher costs inherent in trying to
> do both.
Amen. Blueberry pollination often results in hives coming off the fields
lighter than when they went on.
As the old point of contact for beekeeping in Maine, I still hear from
people who want their crops pollinated for free since " we will let the
beekeeper keep the honey".
Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|