Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:11:48 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim, Allen, et al:
Since testing for contamination for such a small quantity (2 gals), as Jim
points out, seems not very cost-effective, since there are just too many
variables involved in a long/short term effects and their
dubious/questionable/causal manifestations once consumed, as Allen seems
to point out, and since I am feeding feral swarm-captures so that they can
become viable by next spring—-I am, at this point, inclined to feed it
back to the bees, for they are busy drawing brood chambers at this point.
However, I wish someone had done a significant research on “a long term
residual and other chemical inter-and re-actions occurring within honey
over a period of months and years,” for I just do not think local fire
departments can handle tons of imported honey banned for its
chloramphénicol contamination, for instance. What do packers do with that
banned stuff: a further dilution with more good honey? I dung no. It
will be hard to imagine that they will dump their money.
Yoon
Shawnee, OK
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|