Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:28:40 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yoon said:
> But, here, Dave seems to be referring to the aggressive requeening
> practice, which almost all beekeeping books baptize nowadays--
> that every fall or spring, the beekeeper must requeen no matter what
I had assumed up until now that this was due to the decline in
"drone quality" we have seen. (Dare I say lower sperm count?)
I do not replace queens that appear to be doing well in terms of
brood pattern and quantity, but I must agree that I have been
forced to requeen more often in recent years, even when basing
such decisions on clear and compelling metrics.
Offhand, I'd guess that I have bought half again as many
replacement queens in recent years versus what I bought
in the early 1990s.
jim (The Shopping Mall Santa: A strange man wearing
a disguise who asks children to sit in his lap.)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|