BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 May 2003 22:42:22 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>,
Max Watkins <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Resistance can be incorrectly diagnosed - as an example there was one
>beekeeper a few years back who claimed resistance to Bayvarol (another
>pyrethroid treatment) as he had put the strips in his colony and very few
>mites fell. On close examination the hive was found to contain no mites - ie
>a very low infestation, not resistance!
Was the colony followed up for the opposite - bee "resistance" to mites?
We seem to be quick to disempower ourselves.
--
James Kilty

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2