Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:37:05 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Ruth Rosin <[log in to unmask]> a écrit : >
I would not sacrifice scientific rigor to
> brevity in a scientific forum.
> I cannot even begin to go into this issue in
> the present, non-scientific forum, ...
> Again, I cannot go any
> further into this complex issue in a non-scientific
> forum...
> Again, I cannot even
> begin to go into more details on this issue in a
> non-scientific forum.
Please considere that many people in this forum have a
scientific background, sometimes a high scientific
background. I am not an ethomologist, but I am quite
sure I am able to understand your scientific
arguments, even in a foreigner language (from my point
of view, of course). Please, go as far as needed in
your argumentation... otherwise it will just be
another wasted effort (or beating a dead horse,
expression I just learned).
> When I stated that you are “still a DL supporter”, I
> meant, in the face of a very large body of very
> strong evidence against the DL hypothesis. Such
> evidence does support the ”odor alone” hypothesis,
> because there are no other alternatives.
Could you give precise references or facts ? I am not
pro or against any hypothesis. But I would like to
make my own idea by reading studies by myself.
Respectueusement,
Hervé
Laval, Qc
___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|