Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:16:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert Peters wrote:
>Walter Meyer wrote:
>
>>Actually, in another post I mentioned that "Ruhet wohl" was one of my
>>favorite Bach passages. To the extent, however, that the Passions purport
>>to retell the judicial lynching of a charismatic carpenter from Nazareth
>>and the use to which that tale has been put to justify hideous atrocities
>>over the following centuries, I find the texts offensive, in a way that
>>I don't find the Latin texts of the Mass and other Bach works. How much
>>less inflammatory is "Crucifixus etiam pro nobis sub Pontio Pilato,
>>passus et sepultus est"!
>
>Well, the Passions don't defend the "judicial lynching" of Jesus,
>they are desperate about this, so that's not a reason to find them
>offensive.
I think you misunderstood me. Of course the Passions don't defend the
judicial lynching. Neither for that matter do I. I find its retelling
offensive, however, because it continues the tradition of branding the
Jews, all of them and their descendants, as "Christ killers" down to the
time J.S. Bach lived, a tradition that continue in some parts of the
Christian world to this day.
>And the text is innocent of the atrocities of the following
>centuries - with one famous exception: "May his blood come over us
>and our children!" This is the only passage I find offensive.
It goes back to Matthew 27:25, and became a watchword for too many
Christians in the centuries that followed. Bach did not create the
pronouncement but, doubtless in the interest of Biblical accuracy, he
helped perpetuate it.
Walter Meyer
|
|
|