Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sat, 4 Oct 2003 02:32:21 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert Peters writes:
>For me, a lover of Lieder, the words set to music are very important.
For me, the words only have significance because of the music. As you
might gather, I rarely liisten to Lieder. I seem to have no patience
for it, usually wanting the singer to take a break.
>They were the starting point for the composer's imagination.
I don't doubt that, and even I would use the words for inspiration.
But Bach *didn't need* inspirational text to compose masterpieces, as
evidenced by his equally wonderful instrumental music.
>Bach WANTED to set the Gospel according to St. John to music not Anna
>Magdalena's shopping list.
Yes, but what do you think would have been on Anna's list? Don't be so
sure that she wouldn't have any items that might inspire a composer to
churn out a tune or two. Seriously, I'd wager that Bach could have
written great music to just about any stimuli.
>So, are you an idealist or a materialist?
Some of both - we humans are complex organisms. I have my basic
personality which places little weight on spirituality. However, I feel
much spirituality from music, always have. That's a prime reason why I
turn to it so frequently.
Don Satz
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|