HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Meta Janowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2003 14:19:55 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Hi Roberta,

Well these are oddities.  From the pictures it is hard to see if the bases
are simply broken off or ground down?  The shape of the bases (if they are
the bases and not broken off finials) is, as you said, not typical for
creamware.  If they were lids, they might not have a flange if they fit
onto bodies in the manner of Chinese covered cups of the 18th century.  The
clue is probably in how the bases/finials were removed, but we are without
any good suggestions.

Meta

ATOM RSS1 RSS2