HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2003 11:52:06 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Andrew Sewell <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<006e01c31877$9d1e7660$7e5d94ca@oemcomputer>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (142 lines)
I'd be happy to send you one - I'm going to try and scan it to PDF though,
to save costs, as I have gotten more requests for it than expected!
Regards,
Andrew R. Sewell, MS, RPA
Principal Investigator
Historic/Industrial Archaeology
Hardlines Design Company
4608 Indianola Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43214
(614)-784-8733
fax: (614)-784-9336
www.hardlinesdesign.com

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Gaye
Nayton
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 7:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM


True. Can I have one too please : )

Gaye Nayton
10 Central Ave
Maylands
Perth
Western Australia 6051

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Vines" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, 12 May 2003 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM


Even we in Australia could benefit from such a pro forma, so Can I put my
name down for one too please.

Gary Vines
Archaeologist
-----------------------------
Biosis Research Pty. Ltd.
Natural and Cultural Heritage Consultants
322 Bay Street (PO Box 489)
PORT MELBOURNE, 3207

ph: (03) 9646 9499
fax: (03) 9646 9242
mobile: 0428 526 898
mailto:[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Pfeiffer [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, 9 May 2003 11:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM


Since the Ozark National Forest, Like so many in the eastern United States,
was created from formerly private lands, we have Homesteads ALL OVER THE
PLACE.  In conjunction with the Arkansas Archeological Survey, we have a
developed a prototype form which can be filled out in the field by either a
professional or Tech.  The purpose is to give us enough information to
allow  us to determine National Register potential, research potential,
interpretive potential, ect.

As in 99 percent of all CRM work, our purpose is 106 compliance and NOT
what research questions.  Once we determine that a site has potential for
any of these three categories, it goes into the semi-permanent "flag and
avoid" category.  Kind of a "death by benign neglect".  We get to nominate
a couple of site to the National Register every few years which keeps us
Section 110 compliant.  We finagle a Passport In Time (PIT) project every
now and then when we have personnel to supervise the projects.  With these
level of excavations, we get enough real information to determine the
research potential of a site.

Anyone wishing an electronic copy of the form, just let me know.

Smoke.


Smoke (Michael A.) Pfeiffer, RPA
Ozark-St. Francis National Forests
605 West Main Street
Russellville, Arkansas 72801
(479) 968-2354  Ext. 233
e-mail:  [log in to unmask]

It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.




                      Jessica White
                      <[log in to unmask]         To:      [log in to unmask]
                      NET>                     cc:
                      Sent by:                 Subject: 19th-Century
Homesteads and CRM
                      HISTORICAL
                      ARCHAEOLOGY
                      <[log in to unmask]
                      u>


                      05/08/2003 07:13
                      PM
                      Please respond
                      to HISTORICAL
                      ARCHAEOLOGY






Hello!

Does anyone have any references for work done with 19th-century homesteads
in
the context of CRM work?  How does one determine if an artifact scatter (in
this context) should be recommended for more work?  What sort of research
questions can one ask?

Obviously, any help/advice is much appreciated!  :)

Thanks,
Jessica





*************************************************
Jessica White
Historical Archaeologist
Glenn A. Black Lab of Archaeology
Office of Cultural Resource Management
Bloomington, Indiana
*************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2