BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:51:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
> A.) the actual numerical levels of chloramphenicol
>     that have been found

Except for the specific numbers from Louisiana I quoted in
my prior posting, all I ever found was the UK results:
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/webpage/resultshoneytest

And here are the results for streptomycin in honey:
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/webpage/honeytable

In case any one is wondering, "micrograms per kilogram" is
"parts per billion".

> B.) the proven harmful dose for those individuals
>     who are susceptible to developing aplastic anemia
>     from the drug.

Well, I think we can all see from the numbers that 400-500
pounds of honey would have to be consumed to get even
1 milligram of chloramphenicol, and there simply is no
effect from 1 mg of anything except certain deadly poisons
and neurotoxins.  Dunno about cumulative effects, but I can't
see how the human body could "store" the stuff.

From what I read, the number of people who might be at risk
of developing aplastic anemia is a tiny percentage of the
total population anyway.


                        jim

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2