HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:31:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
WHOA! The American Heritage Dictionary is descriptive and not prescriptive.
An entry in the AHD will tell you what people are doing to the
language, not what they should do. Throw that vile thing away!

At 1:45 PM -0500 1/16/03, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>hmm.. here is what American Heritage Dictionary says regarding
>methodology in its USAGE NOTES:

--
[log in to unmask]

Sitting here drinking diet mead
from my plastic fake auroch's horn
flagon, I wonder that my
contemporaries look like a bunch of
old geezers.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2