Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:09:07 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve Schwartz responds to Chris Mullins:
>>But I ask you - if there is a narrative to this piece, how
>>modern/contemporary is it? Isn't narrative supposed to be a
>>middle-class narcotic, a contemporary no-no?
>
>Salonen told of the feelings that the music roused in him. Whether
>Lutoslawski had those same feelings is another question. If the composer
>doesn't provide a prose narrative or some verbal clue, you'll never know
>what the narrative is or even if there is a narrative at all. Narrative
>isn't necessarily a no-no. Shostakovich certainly used programs. Oliver
>Knussen, a very well-respected British composer, also does. Of course,
>neither resorts to narrative all the time, any more than Mozart did.
Lutoslawski was definitely against any programmatic, let alone narrative,
elements in music. Whatever Salonen felt, it was *only* his personal
response which had nothing to do with Lutoslawski's intentions.
-Margaret Mikulska
|
|
|