BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:38:08 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
William wrote:
To compare cumophose treatments ( spray or dip for cattle)
to strips for bees is a matter of great difference in
concentration and method and are not comparable as to risk.
(I will never use it no matter what the concentration.)

We have beat this horse often, so one more go-around will
do little more than increase the entropy of the universe a
fraction more.

Reply:
Maybe you will never use is understood.

To compare coumaphos treatments to strips is also a matter
of great differnce in concentration to be sure. To have
section 18s maybe approved to cover tracks for residues
already starting to appear for rag'ems is shakey politics
as pertains to various treatments on the market today, so
no misuse then technically can be found.

Yes, there is a merry-go-round and it seems it gets faster
and people keep falling off the horses. When does the game
stop?

Regards,

Dee A. Lusby

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2