BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:58:32 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"Karen D. Oland" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> Allen Dick:
> The optimal number from the bees's
> point of view, is one hive per location.  Larger numbers increase
competition,
> and the chances of saturating the area with foragers ...

Such a low number of hives (one) per location would result in very poor
genetic diversity, would it not? Since this would affect long term survival,
I would think a higher density would be "optimal". Although "optimal" might
be one hive placed every couple hundred yards or so, rather than all on top
of each other (as humans are more likely to prefer), within the foraging
(and breeding area).

Karen

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2