HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:55:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
There was a reason to measure bore diameters on the bowl end. When
Harrington was doing his research, bowl shape was the only reliable
dating method.

There were lots of controversies about methods during the period when
the Harrington and Binford methods were introduced, and it took about
ten years for the dust to settle.  One of the arguments against
bore-diameter dating involved variation within a bore, caused by
movements of the wire.

However, one must remember that statistical systems paint with a
broad brush, and individual variations are immaterial from the
general point of view.



--
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2