HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kate and Silas <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:33:51 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
May I suggest that your object may be what collectors refer to as
"Vaseline" Glass - there are numerous collector sites on the Web  cf.
http://www.vaselineglass.org/


Silas Hurry
Historic St. Mary's City

At 04:00 PM 10/24/02 +1000, you wrote:
>Hi Histarch
>
>I have an anomalous glass object among a collection of artefacts from the
>shipwreck Loch Ard (1878).  The artefact is the base of a small vase (or
>perhaps a sorbet glass, as one colleague has suggested). A single seam
>identifies a two piece mould. The strangest attribute of this object is its
>fabric - it is a very bright (almost fluorescent) lime green and has a
>matte finish.  The fabric (and colour) is a consistent opaque fine grain
>(ie no glaze evident, hence it does not appear to be ceramic, no whitening
>around the edges).  There are no maker's marks.  The artefact has some iron
>staining marks (being in association with iron object ie a ship such as the
>Loch Ard). It is possible that the 'matte' finish of the fabric is the
>result of sand abrasion.
>
>I have not had any success searching for information about this type of
>glass. Fenton glass came to mind after a weekend wandering around country
>antique stores, however my research has not located examples of Fenton
>glass in this colour; in addition, Fenton is too late for this shipwreck
>(began production 1905?). I have not tested the object under UV light, but
>the colour also does not appear to be that of uranium glass (this is
>exceptionally green).
>
>I am increasingly suspicious that this artefact is not in fact associated
>with Loch Ard. Does anyone have suggestions for me? I have a sketch & a
>black & white photograph of the artefact that I can send if anyone would
>like to see it. Isn't it typical that we don't have a colour photograph?
>
>Kind Regards
>
>
>Cassandra
>
>
>
>** feel free to reply off-list to reduce unnecessary e-traffic...
>
>
>Cassandra Philippou
>Maritime Heritage Unit
>Heritage Victoria
>Level 22, Nauru House
>80 Collins Street
>Melbourne 3000 Victoria
>Ph:   03 9655 9752
>Fax:  03 9655 9720
>www.heritage.vic.gov.au
>www.aima.iinet.net.au
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>Any personal or sensitive information contained in this email and
>attachments must be handled in accordance with the Victorian Information
>Privacy Act 2000, the Health Records Act 2001 or the Privacy Act 1988
>(Commonwealth), as applicable.
>
>This email, including all attachments, is confidential.  If you are not the
>intended recipient, you must not disclose, distribute, copy or use the
>information contained in this email or attachments.  Any confidentiality or
>privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you in
>error.  If you have received it in error, please let us know by reply
>email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
>**********************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2