Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:10:10 -0500 |
Organization: |
Bedford Advanced Technology Test Lab Effort |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jerry said:
> RFID part is simple and cheap...
Agreed.
> but the fractal antennae...
What is the exact length of this fractal antennae,
and what is the exact surface area?
(The above is a joke for those who know
a little about fractals.)
> and the 100/200 Ghz range may pose problems with
> the regulatory folks, at least in the U.S.
Low-power transmitters don't need much of a license,
so as long as one is not trying to track things miles
away, I can't see the FCC complaining about a few
microwatts of hash in the Ghz range anywhere except
near air bases, radio telescopes, etc.
jim
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|