HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:33:53 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject:
Re: half-assed archaeologists
From:
Geoff Carver <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<a0510030dbbe7a23ec3d3@[162.33.247.252]>
Content-disposition:
inline
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
i've only come this far cuz i found it interesting despite certain profs'
apparent aim of sucking the life out of anything they set their hands to -
i even like theory & think it might be the most important stuff we should
be learning, but... i've learned that thru my own research -

--On Monday, November 24, 2003 7:11 AM -0500 Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> At 12:44 AM -0500 11/24/03, geoff carver wrote:
>> i dunno - it should be good - if only the profs who are supposed to
>> teach it knew what they were talking about, maybe that would help...?
>
> Amen, Brother Carver! Look back on your own educational odyssey. Were the
> subjects boring? Or were the teachers incompetent?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2