HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:54:54 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
Anita Cohen-Williams <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Carol,

Most archaeologists in this country use the metric system when measuring.
The only time I found people using inches was at Wharram Percy in Yorkshire.



At 01:47 PM 9/5/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>This may be mundane to some (many?) of you...but I was wondering (having
>perused Noel-Hume's If Pottery Could Talk the other day)...how the rest of
>you...out there...measure your historic artifacts...etc.  We always use
>metrics for prehistoric stuff (artifacts, units, etc.)...but have the
>policy (out here in San Diego) that English measure is used when dealing
>with historic stuff.  Yet NH measured the plates, etc. in centimeters.  Is
>that just British...or is it done regionally in the US also?

Anita Cohen-Williams
Search Engine Optimizer/Guru
http://www.mysearchguru.com
"Get Your Web Site Noticed!"

Listowner of HISTARCH, SUB-ARCH, & SPANBORD
Archaeology Online Blog (web log)
http://archaeology.blogspot.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2