HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stephen Austin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 05:49:03 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I've got a twenty acre field full of 55 gal drums,
some above ground, some buried.  Some 'sealed'
containers thrown in for variables.  All WW II and
later vintage.  Come research to your heart's
content...

--- Sue Henry Renaud <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If I may weigh in on this -- we don't need to dump
> on 20th-century
> archaeological sites -- ARPA applies to them, now,
> too.  We all have
> different research interests, and early- to
> mid-20th-century archaeological
> sites do have value.  As I have written and spoken
> about (see 1995 CRM
> article at
>
http://crm.cr.nps.gov/issue.cfm?volume=18&number=06/Sup),
> archaeology has a lot it can contribute to our
> understanding of this
> important period in our history precisely because it
> looks at the past
> through a different lens than does historical
> research
>
> Sue Henry Renaud, RPA
>
> (my opinions, not those of my agency)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2