BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dennis M Murrell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 May 2002 08:22:08 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hello Everyone,

Karen wrote:
>Otherwise, we would be
>seeing pockets of resistant feral bees building back up (since they have
had
>as long or longer exposure to the mites as her bees) and true ferals
from
>prior to man-made foundation did exist in the US previously .. some of
them
>had to have been on this more 'natural' cell size and had the genetic
base
>to survive, if her hypothesis is true.

Maybe this could be a factor in the reports noted on bee-l of the return
of feral bees in the southeast and west coast states by various people.

Dennis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2