Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Ormandy conducts American music
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Jon Gallant quotes a Mysterious Somebody:

> "Disc 4 starts with music by Roy Harris, whom Copland displaced,
> although Roy never stopped wrapping himself and his music in the
> flag.  Before his death in 1979 he had composed 15 or so symphonies,
> three of which (Nos.  3, 5 and 7) inhabit the perimeter of the
> repertoire.  The best known and arguably the best written, albeit
> flawed, is the single-movement Third, which Bernstein recorded
> twice with the NYP, but conducted with greater urgency in 1957---a
> performance preserved here.  LB couldnt -- nobody ever could --
> make it move inevitably toward a destination; Harris always spun
> his wheels.  But the procession of gestures in this Third Symphony
> are handsome counterfeits of forward motion."

I'd agree with this about Harris at his worst, but the Third is hardly
his worst.  For me, it moves like gangbusters, as do several other
symphonies - 5, 7, 8, and 9 (of the ones I've heard).  I don't know, of
course, in the absence of information, what the writer means by moving
"inevitably toward a destination," but I suspect that Harris's technique
of continual variation seems to require a commitment to attention.  You
can't let your attention wander, as you can, for example, in Beethoven.
You'd miss things, of course, but you can almost always pick up Beethoven's
thread again.   This is less possible with Harris.

Steve Schwartz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV