Elihu L. Sussman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>I am new to the group so time i chimed in. I have the kempff set and
>generally like it. However it should be noted that there are performances
>he recorded that are not in the set that are better. For example, #23
>was recorded earlier in mono and is a much more vigorous performance.
>Not to say that the complete set performance is bad
I'm not sure exactly what you have, but kempff recorded two complete
cycles: mono in the mid 50s and stereo in the mid 60s. The earlier cycle
is generally reckoned to be better.
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]