Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: A grand experiment
From:
huestis' <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:35:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi all

> One interesting question I would have for those who have "regressed"
> their bees to a smaller size has to do with "bee space".  If 10%
> smaller bees result from regression, do these bees still respect
> the same bee space designed for 10% larger bees?

I like to think that it is todays bees that are 10% larger rather than the
reverse. But 4.9 bees do respect the bee space. But nine frames I don't
believe will work. 11 frame equipment could work also in langstroth equip.
but 10 works fine.

> b)  If they do respect the same bee space as larger bees, what
>     does this imply?

Not much. This size bee was desined for the equipment. Right?  The current
sized bee will fit 9 or 10 frames. 4.9 bees will work 10 or 11 frames.  I
don't see where spacing has much to do with cell size and mite supression.
Spacing has more to do with thermoregulation for over wintering.

Clay

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV