BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Coldiron <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:33:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Don wrote:
> ...I'll admit I've not been doing the cords he describes at that
frequency- I've
> been refreshing them at only once a month.

Reply:
Don, I've been using FGMO for two years now.  I'm like you, fogging every
two weeks.  The emulsion soaked cords were put on earlier in the year just
to see if there was any noticeable difference.  Yes, the colonies did seem
noticeably stronger.  When I pull the supers in a few weeks, I'll probably
put the cords on for the Winter and again in the Spring.  But, to maintain
the cords during the rest of the year with all the supers on is a bit too
labor intensive for me.  I'm beginning to experiment with 4.9 cell size too.
Between the two, it looks like the mites can be managed pretty well.  Of
course Dee will say the 4.9 will do it all.  Guess I'll just have to see.
For me, the 4.9 conversion will only happen in earnest after 4.9 plastic
foundation is available and affordable.

West Texas Mark

ATOM RSS1 RSS2