Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:40:51 -0400
|
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>We Brits are very sparing in giving standing ovations - too sparing
>perhaps. But at least it marks the performance as something the audience
>recognises as special, and one tends to remember for a long time those
>concerts when it happens.
Perhaps that's the problem: it's all or nothing. As soon as one has to
give a Pass/Fail/Excellent assessment of something, one invites "grade
inflation," as it were. If there were lots of shades in between, we can
find something appropriate, instead of excellent all the time. I guess
if I were more comfortable standing all by myself-- if there were a
performance where I was the only one-- I'd feel less uncomfortable being
the only one seated, too.
Let me make a plea for *less* unanimity in "standing ovations."
Individualists everywhere, honk if you agree! (Or don't honk if you
don't agree - - wait a minute; . . . I'm confused . . .:)
P.S. This has little to do with supporting the arts. I'm not complaining
about the philistines standing every time; I'm complaining about those
who should know better setting a bad example.
Arch
|
|
|