[ Note: This is a text version of a document available on the web at
http://www.medieval.org/music/early/02.html
The remaining URLs in this document are links to detailed content
listings for the recordings mentioned. ]
Medieval & Renaissance Recordings of the Year - 2002
It is somewhat difficult to find the proper tone for this year's survey.
I have discussed my priorities in the past, and have also lamented the
state of the recording industry, especially in terms of what is available
in the United States. I was not able to select a record of the year
available in the United States this year, which marks another milestone
in that area.
Simply put, there were few interesting recordings in these genres released
this past year. While 1999 could almost be described as an "embarrassment
of riches," this year's list is not very long. I do want to emphasize,
though, that I have made no compromises, and that every recording listed
is worthy of recognition. There was nothing making a big splash, but
there were still a handful of wholly worthwhile new releases.
That said, let me just recap that I continue to prioritize repertory,
and demand something new of a recording, whether in repertory or
Interpretation. Despite the slow year for recording releases,
interpretations of medieval music continue to head in a positive
direction. There is every reason for optimism on that point, even
if financial considerations have made releasing interesting new
recordings more difficult.
Record of the Year
the French "Diabolus in Musica" ensemble has been no stranger to
this listing, and this year saw them release another fine interpretation.
While the ensemble has been known for Ars Antiqua music, it had
tried its hand at Ars Nova music too, with at least some success.
Here it moves strongly into the 1300s, and even the 1400s, by
focusing on the English music of the period. The greater continuity
with Ars Antiqua style provides a better grounding in the ensemble's
interpretive strengths, and in turn provides an intriguing perspective
on Ars Nova interpretation more generally.
Honi soit qui mal y pense!
Polyphonies des chapelles royales anglaises (1328-1410)
Diabolus in Musica - Antoine Guerber
Alpha Productions 022
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/alp022.htm
While this program does not feature an individual work of any particular
scope, it does include a strong overall selection of fine music, ranging
from various obscure & fragmentary English sources of the early 1300s
to the Old Hall Manuscript of c.1410. The program is well-chosen to
illustrate the continuing English conductus style of the 1300s, as well
as its stylistic connections with the emerging motet. The resulting
perspective on English descant style as it emerged onto the world stage
in the Dunstaple era is particularly worthwhile. Diabolus in Musica
also challenges some assumptions on the rhythmic angularity of some Ars
Nova constructs, although it does so only in sound, not in writing. It
is difficult to argue with the result, as the interpretive success is
grounded directly in the sensible connection between sonorities & phrasing
of the Ars Nova and the Dunstaple era. The isorhythm is tamed in this
way.
Next to other interpretations of this music, of which there have been
relatively few for the early part of this repertory, the grittiness &
sonorousness of Diabolus in Musica's Ars Antiqua-based style serves very
well to highlight the richly consonant nature of English music of this
period, a nature so well-attested in contemporary sources. Some rather
rhythmically animated pieces are included, but the bulk of the program
- especially in the conductus - subsumes that rhythmic impetus into a
smoother style. That combination is what basically defines English
developments of the era, developments which are well-illustrated here.
Energy & phrasing are excellent, and the short pieces are given a
convincing overall shaping.
Honorable Mention
Cantilena Antiqua is another ensemble which had drawn some attention (at
least from me) for their earlier work, but which had worked primarily
with Ars Antiqua music. In their case, it was not polyphony, however,
but rather plainchant sub-styles and some secular monophony. Again, I
had always admired their sound, even if their monophonic material was
not of the highest interest. This year, in teaming with another ensemble,
they have moved into the Ars Nova and polyphony.
Ballate e Madrigali
At the Court of Paolo Guinigi (sec. XV)
Ensemble Cantilena Antiqua / Concentus Lucensis - Stefano Albarello
Tactus 400002
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/tct00002.htm
Superficially, the program is a fairly typical late Italian Ars Nova
program, featuring works by Landini & Ciconia. However, it also includes
a set of masterful (and previously unknown) polyphonic instrumental
pieces by Johannes Octoboni (fl.1400s), evidently a composer of notable
contrapuntal intellect. The named works, referenced as in the Faenza
Codex, are listed as "untexted" & unattributed in most Faenza inventories,
adding a bit of mystery to this release, especially considering that
Octoboni is described in the notes as "the most illustrious musical
presence of the late middle ages" (with respect to Lucca, which is the
theme of the program) while not even possessing a New Grove entry!
Unfortunately, the polyphonic performance ends up blunting what had been
the most notable interpretive strength of the ensemble: Stefano Albarello's
razor voice. Here, the instrumental playing emerges more as a strength,
giving an overall liveliness & polish to the production.
---
Certainly the most provocative medieval recording of the year was released
by well-known ensemble Mala Punica, which made a move to the Harmonia
Mundi label. Recorder player and director Pedro Memelsdorff has a rather
different cast now, but continues to exalt in both the most complicated
motivic & intonational schemes as well as the most bizarre double-talk.
While his latest effort cannot be dismissed, it cannot be easily embraced
either.
Narcisso Speculando
Madrigaux de Paolo da Firenze
Mala Punica - Pedro Memelsdorff
Harmonia Mundi 901732
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/hmu1732.htm
Paolo da Firenze (c.1355-1436/7) was virtually unknown prior to this
recording, and his significance remains difficult to assess. Claimed
as something of a transitional figure akin to Ciconia or Matteo de
Perugia, his influence is difficult to gauge. Of course, although he
has long been recognized in our time, Matteo de Perugia may have been
virtually without influence too. Memelsdorff produces a finely nuanced
interpretation, again adopting what seem to be Baroque sensibilities,
and underscored as such by his strange claims regarding connections to
later madrigal styles. The motivic nature of Paolo da Firenze's style
suits the ensemble's ostinato emphasis well, and serves to produce perhaps
their most characteristic production to date. The ultimate significance
of this recording will probably not be decided for years.
Sequels and series
The past year also saw the release of a couple of notable second volumes,
and these easily warrant inclusion on the present list, just as their
companion volumes had earlier.
The Tallis Scholars released the second half of Gombert's full Magnificat
cycle, an obvious pairing with the first half released last year.
Gombert's Magnificat cycle is one of the most notable pieces of music
of the immediate post-Josquin generation, illustrating both contrapuntal
mastery & delicacy of line. It richly deserved to be recorded in full.
Gombert: Magnificats 5-8
Tallis Scholars - Peter Phillips
Gimell 038
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/gim038.htm
Since Gimell does not provide recording dates (a serious lapse, in my
opinion), I do not know if this recording comes from the same sessions
as the previous one, but it certainly might. There is nothing in personnel
or interpretive style to contradict such a guess. The interpretations
are essentially the same, showing good command of the style, in typical
Tallis Scholars sonority. The energy remains high, and the overall set
can only be considered a triumph. Why it could not be released at one
time, perhaps at 2-for-1 price, is unknown.
---
Also released in 2002 was another volume of William Lawes' consort music
by Phantasm. I wrote of the first volume, released in 2000, that it set
new standards for consort playing. While the second volume (which was
indeed recorded a couple of years after the first) does not make such a
splash, it continues to build on Phantasm's high standards for ensemble
coordination, energy & color.
Lawes: Consorts in six parts
Phantasm
Channel Classics 17498
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/ccs17498.htm
Lawes' consort music remains quirky & interesting, and now we have the
option of hearing it well-played by both Phantasm & Fretwork. It is
difficult to decide whether to prefer the 5- or 6-part consorts, as each
piece seems to have its own sets of strengths & weaknesses. Lawes will
surely remain fresh in this way for some time to come, and here we have
an interpretation & production with no drawbacks.
More instrumental music
Regular readers of my reviews will know that, as a sort of separate
interest alongside medieval and early Renaissance polyphony, I have
a distinct interest in the abstract instrumental music of c.1600.
This was the first body of "real" instrumental music, and I hear in
its eschewal of words, something of a rebirth for medieval technique.
One cannot hear anything specifically medieval in e.g. Lawes, but the
general colorful abstraction is there.
Similar remarks apply to Trabaci, another of the more quirky & individual
composers of the period. Previously, his keyboard music had appeared
only in anthologies, but this year, Naxos finally released the first
volume in a complete survey. The recordings had been promised for years,
but have been released only now, and on a limited basis.
Trabaci: Keyboard Music - Book I
Sergio Vartolo
Naxos 8.553550-2 (3 CDs)
http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/cds/nxs53550.htm
Trabaci's music possesses an intriguing sense of instrumental rhetoric,
as well as a keen sense of interval as derived from the tuning experiments
in Naples at the time. Here, Vartolo argues for him as the "the first
Baroque composer," an assessment essentially impossible to confirm.
Nonetheless, it makes for a fun argument. Trabaci is perhaps the clearest
predecessor to Frescobaldi, but adopts a more rigorous contrapuntal
style, even in his toccatas.
Whereas Trabaci had previously languished without a dedicated volume,
he received another survey this year, from Michele Deverite, and Naxos
is already releasing his second book of keyboard music to start 2003.
So there is suddenly plenty to hear. While possessing the obvious merit
of being a full survey, the present set is also accomplished in its
interpretive mastery. Vartolo has been recording music of this era
regularly, and so comes to Trabaci with a fine background & sympathetic
sense for the music. The result is quite satisfying, lucid in texture
and cogently phrased. A variety of keyboard instruments is used, but
that variety could have been supplemented by other instruments, as
Trabaci's scores allow ensemble arrangements. The Naxos recording also
lacks vividness, and does not come with any detailed discussion of the
individual pieces. Nonetheless, it can only be considered a notable
success.
Happy 2003!
Todd McComb
[log in to unmask]
|
