I was typing quickly, of course it has to meet one of the criterion and context matters.  

josh

>>> [log in to unmask] 10/17/02 12:36PM >>>
No - this is the problem.  There are people in CRM
that think the NHPA establishes significance and that
anything 50 years old automatically establishes
significance.


--- Josh Duncan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This is exactly what archaeology has come to in the
> 21st century and it is shocking that this is a
> surprise.  The National Historic Preservation Act
> lays it out pretty clear, 50 years old makes it
> significant.