Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:58:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Greetings, again:
Of course, Murray, I am not talking about using queen cells to requeen, a
too time-consuming procedure for most American commercial outfit,
operating on efficacy-paradigm. I am talking about simply ordering
hundreds or thousands of queens for immediate replacement, for they will
start laying eggs immediately without losing the valuable time, especially
at the onset of a heavy honey flow. Similarly, I am not talking about
requeening with Russians for improvement of the stock, either. I am
merely talking about requeening solely to invigorate the egg-laying and
thus maximize the honey production. I nevertheless always appreciate many
of you Brits brining different perspectives to the table, though.
To start, I would like to hear about any research done on the *long-term
consequences of annual requeening*, if such study has ever been done.
Yoon
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|