BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tim Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 May 2002 10:16:33 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
From Dee's forward:

">including an unknown mitotype that was neither European
nor
(sub-Saharan)
>African, but perhaps of circum-Mediterranean origin[9].

This then could well be a native matriline, couldn't it,
existing
since
time before Columbus?"

Dee, wouldn't this be just another example of the data that seems to be
piling up for the continued existence of pockets of Iberian bees brought by
the Spanish? Seem's rather clear to me. Florida, like the South West was
Spanish.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2