Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Bumble honey . . .
From:
stephen j clark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Apr 1993 10:57:47 -0400
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dear Bee-Liners:
 
As a regular reader of this newsletter, I appreciate both the exchange of
information and the correction of misinformation.  However, I find ad
hominem attacks, an example of which follows, both boorish and unnecessary.
 
>                After such scholarly contributions about the spread of
>the European honeybee in the New World, it was a bit disappointing to
>read [...]'s message about bumblebee honey.  Here are some
>corrections:
 
        *       *       *       *       *       *       *
 
>Well, I'm sorry to be insulting, but I suspect that many Native Americ-
>ans were (and doubtless still ARE!) better naturalists than some academ-
>ic "ecologists"!
 
Let's try for a higher tone.
 
Stephen Clark
Vassar College

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV