BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Kevan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Mar 1992 20:19:36 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Tue, 3 Mar 1992 16:03:43 EDT from <JT@SBBIOVM>
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
In response to the interesting posting by JT, I can only say that
if I stand corrected, I congratulate the innovators who have overcome
the problem of year-round rearing of Bombus colonies. My impression
was that there was great difficulty in this aspect of Bombiculture.
I am not aware of any literature which indicates how the problem
has been overcome. This is not that surprising, I suppose, given the
commercial potential of such a break through. I presume that it will
be a matter of time before the technology is published. I understand that
Chris Plowright is able to provide bumblebees for research and commerce.
My remarks on the need for Bombiculture to be able to provide bumble-
bees for pollination services to agriculture/horticulture at pretty well
anytime and with consistent reliability seem to be "dated" given this
new information.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2