BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tim Arheit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:17:34 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
At 07:53 AM 3/8/02 +1300, you wrote:
>I was thinking about the design of the extractor, and wondering
>whether it could be made more minimal.
>Surely someone has thought of this, or isn't it such a good idea?

Actually It's mostly been though of.   The beekeeping museum at
Wooster has a similar extractor that spins the frames and the
container.  It didn't have tapered sides so the honey pretty much
sticks to the sides until it stops spinning.

What would the advantage be to removing the honey from
the top of the container rather than the bottom?

-Tim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2