BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 22:52:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
[log in to unmask] said:

> I believe to practice apitherapy you have to make yourself judgment proof
> as well.  Didn't Mraz put everything he owned in his daughters name for just
> that reason and give his apitherapy for free?

This is yet a big reason why it makes all sorts of sense to teach apitherapy
patients to self-administer bee stings from bees that they raise themselves.

Beekeepers get stung by bees.  This is an nearly unavoidable aspect
of the hobby/profession.  If the stings happen to help mitigate the
symptoms of a beekeeper's pre-existing medical condition, great!

But no one is "liable" for the actions of apprentice beekeepers except
themselves, since they undertake beekeeping by choice.

> Look at all the difficulty in just getting an acaricide approved to treat
> bees, now try to get bees approved to treat humans.

Such "approval" is only required if one wishes to turn bees into tiny
expensive winged syringes in the hands of the medical profession.
Why would anyone want that when they are now as close to "free"
as anything could be?

        jim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2