Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:27:58 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
To Herve Lege, Hi.
In a message of Sept. 9, you requested that I provide a full proper treatment of the DL controversy. It is unfortunately impossible to properly fully deal with a scientific controversy that has been going on for over 35 years, in e-mails to Bee-L. I have been advised by the moderators of this website that messages should preferably be not more tan 500 words long.
You also requested reading material that would enable you to make up your own mind. I suggest:
Wenner & Wells (1990). Anatomy of a Controversy: The Question of a "Language" Among Bees. Columbia University Press.
Wenner, A. M. (2002). The elusive honey bee dance "language" hypothesis. J. Insect Behavior. (This article is available on the Internet.)
Rosin , R. (1999).What is wrong with the honeybee "dance language" hypothesis? American bee Journal, vol. 139(no.9), p. 659.
Sincerely,
Ruth Rosin ("prickly pear")
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|