Michael Cooper wrote:
>I will venture to say I am not fond of Horowitz's Scriabin. I submit that
>Horowitz formed a big part of how we listen to Scriabin, which we may not
>be as fond of if he had appeared in a later era.
I am neither an expert on Scriabin or Horowitz but I would love to
learn how we wouldn't have been as fond of the Horowitz interpretation
if Horowitz "had appeared in a later era. I am reading your statement
correctly I hope? " Can you clarify. Thank you.
Ed Beach