BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: IPM
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:27:22 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Peter Dillon
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Commenting on being overwhelmed by mites due to re-infestation
>- IPM by definition maintain population levels at or under damaging
>levels.
Agreed. Monitoring mite levels and having the response ready for the
critical level is the way. Presumably this means oxalic acid for late
re-infestations unless the temperature is high enough for other
treatments.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2