HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 06:20:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
At 1:45 PM -0400 6/16/02, Robert L. Schuyler wrote:
>
>P.S. I disagree with Ned's comments on Industrial Archaeology (or at
>least I think I do) but we have already killed off that horse for
>discussion in an earlier HISTARCH talk.
>
>Patrick - Has it stopped snowing in Houghton yet for the season? Perhaps
>that is why you are cranky.
>

Bob:

Which dead horse did you have in mind? I'm still plowing behind this one:



>  >>Industrial archaeologists should concern themselves with the
>>>archaeology of the process, and its impact on the industrial
>>>community and society at large. But let's not call it industrial
>>>archaeology when we dig the ironmaster's household midden or the
>  >>company store.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2