Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:21:19 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Peter,
£Ôrue that acquired characters cannot be inherited. however I can see that it is possible that
if previous generations of bees were reared in larger cells (with larger celled foundation),
these individuals can be larger, and therefore might make larger cells even if not given
foundation. not really through genetics but maybe larger bees make larger cells?
Of course the point is moot is Marla has shown that bees prior to foundation use had
cell size similar to now.
Zachary Huang
http://www.cyberbee.net
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:25:42 -0500, Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Greetings
>
>There have been many discussions in this forum on the worker cell
>size of naturally built comb. Despite the fact that many researchers
>have concurred that European bees make comb with worker cells that
>average around 53 mm (Taber & Owens, Michener), some people contend
>that this size reflects an artificial enlargement *caused* by the use
>of foundation based on larger than natural dimensions. This idea
>itself is based on a faulty understanding of biology (externally
>induced characteristics are not passed on to offspring).
|
|
|