Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Endless Melody
From:
Ed Zubrow <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:54:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Reading some liner notes I came across the following curious passage:

   "...in 1942 Milhaud in an article entitled 'Why I Love Gounod and
   Verdi,' expatiated on the value of the 'Latin tradition' maintained
   by these two composers in the face of 'the most implacable assault'
   from Wagner. Like Stravinsky, Milhaud believed that 'endless melody'
   was a contradiction in terms."

I found this curious because its two parts don't seem to connect.  I
view the "Latin tradition" as a largely melodic one; certainly Verdi's
music is full of memorable melody.  And I can appreciate the assault on
such a tradition from the harmonically dense music of Wagner.  And I can
see where Stravinsky would be coming from in his statement given the
rhythmic emphasis and short units in his music.  What I can't see is how
they all fit together.  Where am I wrong in my assumptions, or what am I
missing?

Ed

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV