Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Lusby strain
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:17:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>If the Lusby's have got a better strain of bee I say
>use it. Lots of people are trying to confuse this whole subject and all it
>needs is to be tried (trial & tested).


I hope no one takes this seriously. The entire state of Arizona is
Africanized, and I sincerely hope no one is deliberately moving bees
out of there to northern states. You should remember that the results
they are having could be entirely environmental in nature (hot, dry
climate), which means the effects could not be exported to most other
regions.

By the way, there is nothing confusing in stating that in Africa
smaller cells and smaller bees in do not reduce mites, which seems to
cast doubt on this being a main factor.

There is nothing confusing in stating that the Lusbys have so many
variables going on that no one (not even them) can say what is the
main factor in their reduction of mite counts.



--

Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV