Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:30:51 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1257" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Beefriends
Max Watkins writes:
> To clarify - the average control of varroa mites provided by Apiguard
> treatments is 93%.
It means that 7 mites of 100 survive. Recently we use Apistan and its
efficiency at the beginning was promised higher than 99%. It means that
about 1 mite of 100 survives.
Does it mean that the mite resistance to Apiguard will develop about 7 times
sooner than to Apistan, having a much higher efficiency? Your opinion,
please.
The third and fourth week of this January, after usual air temperatures
between -10 and -27 C, we got 2 warm weeks with temperatures from -2 to +2
C. Some beekeeper report that they noticed the queens' activity in their
hives. Usually it starts here a month later. They are worried about the
provision and added some dry food (sugar powder plus honey). Now we have a
usual winter with air temperatures between -5 and -10C.
Best wishes
Rimantas Zujus
Amateur beekeeper
Kaunas, Lithuania
55 North, 24 East
ICQ 4201422
http://gytis.lei.lt/~zujus/
e-mail : [log in to unmask]
http://www.lei.lt (Lithuanian Energy Institute)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|