BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Radiation damage
From:
Thomas Cornick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:28:49 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
In a message dated 2/26/02 11:59:39 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> As the same irradiation process is used for a lot of medical equipment and
> condoms, you would hope Allen's scenario does not apply.
>
>

Well I can understand reusing medical equipment because of the expense but we
just buy new condoms.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2