BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:42:28 +0000
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Lloyd Spear
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>And, if genetics was a=
>t work, I have not allowed them any chance to produce a new queen.
A.m.m. will often supersede in autumn. In our mild climate (here) that
can work well. Last year several late supersedures turned drone layers
since the weather was very wet. In a variable autumn, there can be
sufficient mating windows of opportunity. Also colonies can keep drones
late, either for supersedure in the autumn or even in the spring.
Overall it is a trait I value *here*.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2