BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:13:28 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Comments:
cc: Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Dee Lusby writes:
>Peter, what exactly do you mean by "true" type of honey bee in your
>mind? I know what it means to me.

In conventional beekeeping these are referred to as races or
sub-species, such as the Italian, Carniolan, etc. From what you have
said, you seem to be saying that "mongrels" are a bad thing, when
compared to their opposite -- an unmixed type.

Do you have such a type, or race, and where did it come from?

--
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2