CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Margaret Mikulska <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:52:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Peter Harzem wrote:

>It seems to me that the movements of a work involve essential continuity,
>both in the work itself and in the effects on the listener.  Intervals
>between them do (don/t they) provide moments for reflection, continuity,
>etc.  Applause in those intervals would be an intrusion, an unwelcome
>disruption of all that.  One of the precious practices that survive, even
>if precariously, in classical music performances (but few, if any, other
>situations) is regard for others' feelings, comfort, etc.  This, I believe,
>is something that needs to be protected as jealously as possible.

Indeed; there is a good reason why many singers specifically ask the
audience to wait with the applause until the last song in a group (cycle,
etc.).  But apparently some listeners believe that their boundless joy, no
matter how disruptive for others, is more important than anything else.

-Margaret Mikulska

ATOM RSS1 RSS2